The Spinal Cord Injury Zone - News - http://www.thescizone.com/news

Stem Cell Scientist Sets Record Straight on Spinal Cord Injury Trials
Published on 08/8/2007
1
By Kristen Philipkosk

There's been lots of confusion and some mischaracterizations about when the first embryonic stem cell clinical trial might take place and what it might treat. Spinal cord injury has been a leading candidate. Hans Keirstead, a scientist at the University of California at Irvine has been at the center of the discussions. His work, which has helped rats with severed spinal cords "walk" again, is funded by Geron, a biotech company in Northern California. Geron executives have adjusted their timeline for trials several times, which is perhaps understandable but has led to some of the confusion.

Keirstead has addressed a spinal cord injury message board to clear things up. He's got three projects in the works, the first of which does not use stem cells at all (it's an antibody, thanks Steven!) The second will use embryonic stem cells to treat acute (i.e. recent) spinal cord injures. The third and newest effort addresses chronic spinal cord injuries.

Read Keirsteads full post from CareCure after the jump. Not to get sappy or anything, but that last paragraph makes me want to, I don't know, have brunch with him.

In response to a recent news misquote and queries over the last year, I would like to clarify my views on the timeline to the clinic for the treatments being developed by my research team.

It would be foolish and misleading to say that one will cure or ‘fix’ someone with a spinal cord injury in a given period of time. I hope that through perseverance and a lot of hard work our research developments will benefit people’s lives, but I have no orb with which to predict the future.

What I do know is this: the treatments that we are developing improve the outcome of spinal cord injury in rats but do not completely cure them. We do not know if these approaches will work in humans until we test them in humans. Importantly, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), informed by clinical trial results, will ultimately determine if and when a treatment becomes available to the public.

The first potential treatment that my research team has developed is an injection-based therapy intended for acute spinal cord injury, meaning that it would be administered within hours of the injury. The treatment significantly decreases spinal cord loss when administered within this narrow time frame. After developing the treatment, our team and others showed that it improved the outcome of rodent models of spinal cord injury, multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis and ulcerative colitis. In 2006, Medarex Corporation began a clinical trial evaluation of this approach in patients with ulcerative colitis. We are overjoyed to see this treatment being tested in humans, and hope to see the treatment used ‘off-label’ in spinal cord-injured people should the ulcerative colitis trials prove successful.

The second potential treatment that my research team has developed is intended for sub-acute spinal cord injury, to be administered within weeks of the injury. This treatment is a human embryonic stem cell-based therapy that re-insulates the electrical conduits of the spinal cord that lost their insulation following injury. Our research team has shown that this treatment bettered the outcome of rodent models of spinal cord injury and is safe. Further safety tests are now being conducted, and Geron Corporation is planning a clinical trial using this approach in 2008. They deserve our support for their pioneering and heroic efforts to get the first FDA-approved human embryonic stem cell-based treatment to the clinic.

The third potential treatment that my research team is developing is intended for chronic spinal cord injury. Ideally, this therapy could be administered months, years or decades after an injury, and understandably is a research direction that has created great excitement among the spinal cord injury community. However, it is important for people to understand that we have only just begun this endeavor. We have not yet even determined whether the tools that we have developed work in animal models or are safe. The outcome of these early studies will determine if and when this therapeutic approach will move forward to further animal testing and, ultimately, clinical evaluation.

I promise that my research team will push towards the goal of treating spinal cord injured people with intellectual rigor and tremendous personal intensity. We understand that our job is to invent safe and effective treatments that may then be evaluated in the clinic. I expect that we will fail and succeed along the way, and thank you in advance for allowing us to do both.



DETAILS OF DR.ASHOK PATEL

NAME : DR.ASHOK PATEL
FATHER’S NAME : MR. JOITARAM PATEL
DATE OF BIRTH : 11TH JANUARY-1969
NATIONALITY : INDIAN
MARITAL STATUS : MARRIED
MAILING ADDRESS: Pooja surgical hospital
2nd floor, shiv market
Opp.bus stand
VISNAGAR-384315
GUJARAT (INDIA )
Email: gargyashok@yahoo.co.in
Phone: 02765-230809 Mobile: 9824012520

• STUDIED AT B.J.MEDICAL COLLEGE AND CIVIL HOSPITAL, AHMEDABAD.

• DETAILS OF STEM CELL THERAPY IN SPINAL CORD INJURY.

NAME: DR.ASHOK J.PATEL
AGE: 37 YEARS
QUALIFICATION: M.S. (GENERAL SURGERY)
H/O CAR ACCIDENT ON 22ND NOVEMBER 2003
TIME PERIOD: ABOUT 3 YEARS.

TRAUMATIC PARAPLEGIA, DUE TO C6-C7 LEVEL SPINAL CORD INJURY.

MRI: (23/11/2003) FINDINGS ARE SUGGESTIVE OF SPINAL CORD EDEMA EXTENDING FROM C6 TO C7 LEVEL-
-WHIPLASH INJURY.
MULTIPLE COMPRESSION WEDGE FRACTURES AT C6, C7, D1, D2, D3, AND D5 VERTEBRAL BODIES WITHOUT RETROPULSION OR COMPRESSIVE ELEMENT.

NO H/O OF SURGICAL INTERVENTION AFTER ACCIDENT

RECENT MRI: GLIOSIS PRESENT AT THE LEVEL C6-C7,
VERTIBRAL COLUME – NORMAL

.
O/E:
PARALYSIS WITH SENSORY AND MOTOR LOSS FROM D-1 LEVEL.
MOVEMENTS OF BOTH UPPER LIMBS WERE NORMAL .
BOWEL PARALYSIS AND AUTONOMAS BLADDER.
I WAS IN STATE OF SPINAL SHOCK.

TOUCH SENSATION DEVELOPED GRADUALLY WITH IN ONE WEEK OF INJURY.
INTERCOSTAL MUSCLES GRADUALLY DEVELOPED TONE AND POWER WITH IN FOUR MONTHS.
MOTOR POWER OF 2ND TOE OF LEFT LIMB STARTED IN 4TH MONTH.

TOUCH SENSATION PRESENT IN BOTH LIMBS.
PAIN & TEMPERATURE SENSATION ABSENT FROM CLAVICULAR REGION.

GRADE-1 POWER PRESENT IN LEFT ANKLE JOINT.
OCCASIONAL PLANTER FLEXOR MOVEMENT ON RT.ANKLE JOINT.

FULL BLADDER SENSATION PRESENT.

STEM CELL THERAPY TAKEN—

1ST STEM CELL INJECTION TAKEN IN MOSCOW.
(AUTOLOGOUS) IN 13TH JULY-2005
2ND STEM CELL INJECTION TAKEN IN LAST WEEK OF OCTOBER-2005
AFTER STEM CELL THERAPY:
1. I CAN SEAT FOR ABOUT 6 TO 8 HOURS, WHICH WAS NOT BEFORE.

2. PERSPIRATION HAS STARTED UP TO T-11 LEVEL AFTER ONE AND HALF MONTHS OF 1ST INJECTION.

3. URODYNEMIC STUDY IMPROVED AFTER THERAPY.I CAN EVECUATE BLADDER ABOUT 350 ML.AND NO RESIDUAL URINE.

4. POWER OF TRUNK MUSCLES IS GRADUALLY IMPROVING.

5. NO SENSORY IMPROVEMENT.

I HAVE TAKEN STEM CELL THERAPY (EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS) IN I.K.D. INSTITUTE IN AHEMEDABAD, GUJARAT ON 31ST AUGUST-2006.
A CHARGE IN AHMEDABAD IS 30,000 RS.

I have some questions to ask you for my treatment,

1) In c6-c7 spinal cord injury, quadriplegia is not there. After surgery for stem cells transplantation is there any chance of quadriplegia?
2) What is the procedure for admission to your institute?
3) How long stay for treatment?
4) Single or multiple sittings of treatment?
5) What is the cost of treatment?
6) How many pt. of spinal cord injury have you treated? And what is an about result?
7) What is about recovery of pts. After stem cell transplant?

PLEASE REPLY ABOUT YOUR PROGRAME AND OBLIGED.

THANKS
Dr.ashok patel
Visnagar.



http://www.thescizone.com/news/articles/1357/1/Stem-Cell-Scientist-Sets-Record-Straight-on-Spinal-Cord-Injury-Trials/1.html